Macro test vs micro test

Q: Macro test vs micro test a.k.a the coverage for the whole product like V model coverage v.s specific bug hunting
A: Test as wide as possible is more preferable than test as deep as possible, which have higher return of invest. Test deep is good to when there are resource. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Such a cold summer

I almost did not wear the t-shirt alone this summer, always have a jacket on when I went outside. Most of time the temperature is lower than 20 c-degree. Totally did not get the feeling of summer. What a pity.
Read more

My Unsolve Questions

How to reduce the admin work for tester? test Measurement, Management, Communication, Automation.  Agile: Test Might take longer time than development.  How to solve that in Agile? how to make exp test efficient in scurm. does tester be scurm master better sit with developer or tester in scrum should we can Quality advisor Automation test negitive test?
Read more

My interview questions to a company using SAFe.

What is the setup of your QA team?  What is the ratio of Test vs Developer Do you have the system layer test?  Do you have the non function test layer?  How do you divide the train, do you have plat form team, and do they have their own train? Any support work in the team` What is the good part, and what is the bad part How long does the team learn how to do PI planning.  What is the biggest challenge you meet,  Did you have any challenge when you split up the team?  Any suggestion on how to devide the team, and what is the practise in lego.  In the new setup, is it possible different team work on a same product of same feature?  BDD:  In which level do you apply the BDD, how do you use it in integration level? who responsible for design and implemented BDD? Agile: What is your product, do you have technical(platform) team, how do you make them work in the agile framework.  Special list can swap among ...
Read more